The Dalai Lama explains that one of the criteria is the effect on other experiences or expectations of happiness that follows the act. If the act is seen as violent by harming others, the act is potentially unethical. I think that it is obvious that if an action does violence to someone else and so hurt them, it can’t be ethical. No violent crime like a murder can be ethical I think, even if the behavior has a ‘valid’ motif. After that, the Dalai Lama explain that the content of our action is also important. To this criterion, I would also agree. An action that is meant to be for the…