Sam Harris’s and Dalai Lama’s points of view are quite different. Both are trying to explain moral progress and how to understand it. Sam leans on explaining morals with science. This argument against religion/philosophy persuades that science is the best way to know how people ought to act in life. Sam believes that traditional religion does not affect morality. For example, knowledge reveals the principles that promote human flourishing, and there is always a right or wrong answer, which ultimately brings happiness.