Sam Harris and Dalai Lama do not think about moral progress in the same way. They both investigate having calm and prosperous society where everyone will find a place. Nevertheless, I think they would disagree on the notion of moral progress since they have different ways of achieving this goal. In the first case, Harris thinks that science is the key to answer moral and ethical questions. He is certain that communication, observation, and reflection are enough to lead us to a better society by pointing out what is right and what is wrong. While Dalai clearly thinks that science is useless…